All countries
Indonesia
Coordinating Ministry for Food Affairs, Ministry of National Development Planning, and the National Food Agency
Indonesia governs food systems through a large and centralised bureaucracy. Within this landscape, three institutions are specifically tasked with supporting alignment across institutions: the Coordinating Ministry for Food Affairs, established in 2024 to facilitate policy coherence across the food system; the Ministry of National Development Planning (BAPPENAS), which aligns priorities across sectors within the national development framework; and the National Food Agency (BAPANAS), established in 2021 for sector-specific coordination within the food system.
Coordinating Ministry for Food Affairs
Institutional set-up and structure. Established in 2024 by Presidential Decree No. 147 of 2024. It is tasked with overseeing food governance across the Ministry of Agriculture, the Ministry of Forestry, the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries, the Ministry of Environment and the Environmental Control Agency, the National Food Agency and the National Nutrition Agency. It also collaborates with the Ministry of Defence, including military agencies, on programmes such as the Food Estate and Food Brigade initiatives.
Mandate and decision-making power. The facilitation of policy coherence across the food system was placed under the Coordinating Ministry's jurisdiction on its establishment. Its role is one of strategic coordination rather than direct policy implementation. Of the three coordinating ministries, it holds the broadest formal mandate: it is the only institution in the mapping with a direct mandate spanning almost all food system sub-functions, from production, processing and distribution through retail and marketing, public and household food environments, and food waste, to financing and overall food system coherence.
The Coordinating Ministry is tasked with the following roles (building blocks):
Agenda setting: advocacy and dialogue
Implementation: coordinating policy and programme implementation; coordinating financial resources
Monitoring and evaluation: monitoring, evaluation and reporting
Who is involved. Six ministries and agencies within its oversight — agriculture, forestry, marine affairs and fisheries, environment (with the Environmental Control Agency), the National Food Agency and the National Nutrition Agency — together with the Ministry of Defence on specific programmes. It shares coordination mandates with the Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs on food distribution, financing and food security, and with the Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Cultural Affairs on food security.
How it works in practice. The Coordinating Ministry convenes the ministries and agencies within its remit to align action across sectors. Its establishment gave food a coordinating ministry of its own for the first time, creating a single point of oversight across a set of mandates previously distributed across the economic affairs and human development portfolios. Because it is newly established, evidence of its operating practice is still emerging: the analysis found that its mandate is broad on paper while its exercise of that mandate through policy instruments had yet to begin.
Strengths
The broadest food system mandate of any institution in the landscape, spanning nearly all functions from production to consumption, financing and overall coherence — giving it standing to align action across the full system
Standing as a coordinating ministry in its own right brings a sharper and more visible focus on food than the previous distribution of these mandates across other portfolios
A concrete example of the multisectoral coordination arrangement that is often recommended internationally and rarely implemented, placing Indonesia among the countries testing this model in practice
Opportunities for improvement
Clarifying how coordination mandates fit together. Setting out how the Coordinating Ministry's role relates to those of the National Food Agency, the National Nutrition Agency, the other coordinating ministries and the line ministries would reduce overlap and strengthen accountability across the system.
Extending coordination beyond the current group of ministries and agencies. Bringing the mandates that sit outside the present arrangement — particularly in trade, industry, health and the enterprise portfolios — into a shared coordination process would reach the midstream parts of the food system where policy attention is currently lightest.
Translating the mandate into instruments. Moving from mandate to practice — through the coordination mechanisms, agreed processes and policy instruments the role provides for — would give the coordination function visible effect across the ministries and agencies it oversees.
Ministry of National Development Planning (BAPPENAS)
Institutional set-up and structure. A strategic cross-sector planning body with a mandate to coordinate policy development across all national-level ministries and institutions, working within the national development framework.
Mandate and decision-making power. BAPPENAS focuses on aligning development priorities across sectors and ministries to ensure policy coherence within the national development framework, and develops the national development plan against which sectoral priorities are set. It holds direct mandates in forestry, natural resource management, environmental protection, urban food planning, public procurement, food waste, food security, food aid and public education, alongside overall food system coherence. It also serves as vice coordinator and executive secretary of the National Team for the Acceleration of Poverty Reduction, through which it works on the Non-Cash Food Aid Programme. Its role is one of planning and alignment; like the Coordinating Ministry, it had not issued a food system policy instrument of its own at the time of the analysis.
How it works in practice. BAPPENAS sets the national development plan and works with line ministries to align their own plans to it, giving it reach across every food system relevant portfolio rather than a defined membership. Its cross-government position means its planning cycle is one of the few points at which food system priorities across sectors are brought into a single frame.
National Food Agency (BAPANAS)
Institutional set-up and structure. A non-ministerial agency established in 2021, responsible for sector-specific coordination within the food system, particularly for strengthening food governance and food security management.
Mandate and decision-making power. Its coordination role is operational and sector-focused. It holds direct mandates across a wide span of functions — agriculture and fisheries, natural resource management, biosecurity, commercial food safety, processing, packaging, labelling, distribution, retail, advertising and marketing, commercial food waste, public procurement, school and hospital food environments, sport and cultural venues, food security and overall food system coherence. Together with the Ministry of State-Owned Enterprises, it coordinates the roles of the state-owned enterprises BULOG (food commodity logistics), IDFood (finished products) and PTPN (agricultural commodities). Unlike the two coordinating institutions above, it issues regulatory instruments in its own right.
How it works in practice. The Agency combines a coordination role with regulatory output. Despite its relatively recent establishment, it was the third-largest issuer of food system policy instruments in the landscape, after the central government and the Ministry of Agriculture, with 14 of the 93 directly relevant policies identified. Its reach extends from production through to public food environments, including school and hospital food.
Evidence base: key informant interviews and policy documents, 2026. Last updated: September 2026.